Guide news
All Latest News →Current developments
GMC training survey shows improvement but persistent variation
General Medical CouncilGMC’s April 2026 launch of the LE and SAS doctor survey
General Medical Council04
Respond
GMC referral, self-referral and triage
Understand who may notify the GMC, what doctors must report and how the regulator decides whether a concern needs provisional enquiry or full investigation.
Anyone can raise a concern, but the GMC acts only within its statutory public-protection role. Doctors also have personal reporting duties for specified criminal, regulatory and official-inquiry events. If unsure, obtain defence advice promptly and use the current GMC guidance rather than relying on workplace opinion.
By the end of this module, you should be able to:
- Explain GMC referral thresholds and the three elements of public protection.
- Recognise events that may require personal notification.
- Understand triage, disclosure to a responsible officer and provisional enquiries.
Who can raise a GMC concern
Patients, relatives, employers, responsible officers, police, coroners, other regulators and members of the public may provide information. The GMC can consider information from any source. Employer referrals should be threshold-based and normally involve the responsible officer and Employer Liaison Adviser unless urgency or seriousness requires immediate action.
A referral is an allegation, not a finding. The doctor should obtain the material and understand whether the employer has completed local fact-finding, what safeguards exist and which matters remain disputed.
- Referral source does not decide outcome.
- Responsible-officer routes matter.
- Urgent risk may justify immediate contact.
The GMC threshold
The GMC's statutory objective covers health, safety and wellbeing of the public, public confidence, and proper professional standards. Its guidance distinguishes minor or locally remediable matters from serious or unresolved current risk. Some matters are shared with the doctor and responsible officer for reflection even when no investigation is opened.
Serious dishonesty, sexual misconduct, violence, grossly negligent or reckless clinical behaviour, unlawful discrimination, abuse of trust and unmanaged risk are examples that may reach the threshold, but every case depends on facts and context.
- Seriousness and current risk matter.
- Local management may be sufficient.
- Labels do not replace evidence.
Personal reporting duties
Good medical practice requires doctors to tell the GMC without delay if they accept a caution, are charged with or found guilty of a criminal offence, or are criticised by an official inquiry. Supporting guidance covers specified alternative police disposals and findings by regulatory bodies in the UK or overseas. Exact obligations are technical and should be checked against the current document.
Do not wait for an employer to report on your behalf. Equally, do not make an unnecessary or inaccurate self-referral without advice. Obtain the formal document, date, jurisdiction and outcome.
- Check current reporting guidance.
- Report without delay where required.
- Use exact documents and advice.
Triage and early closure
Triage asks whether the concern is within the GMC's remit, sufficiently serious and supported enough to require action. In 2025, most triaged concerns were closed before full investigation. Closure does not necessarily mean the concern was false; it can mean it did not meet the regulatory threshold or was better addressed elsewhere.
The GMC may share some lower-level information with the responsible officer to check for a wider pattern or support reflection. A doctor should not assume that no formal investigation means no local follow-up.
- Most concerns do not reach full investigation.
- Closure reasons differ.
- Local action can continue.
Provisional enquiries
Where seriousness or evidence is unclear, the GMC may seek one or two discrete pieces of information before deciding whether to open a full investigation. This may concern a single clinical episode, health, evidence reliability, insight or remediation. The doctor may be notified and eligible for the commissioned Doctor Support Service.
Treat a provisional enquiry seriously but do not describe it as a finding or full investigation. Ask what information is sought, the response date and whether your responsible officer or employer is being contacted.
- Clarify the stage.
- Answer the discrete request carefully.
- Access support early.
Preparing a self-referral or initial response
A safe notification is complete, accurate and proportionate. Identify the event, date, authority, status and documents; explain immediate safeguards; avoid speculation about contested facts. Your defence adviser can help ensure that the notification meets duties without creating inconsistency with criminal or employment advice.
Keep proof of submission and future updates. If circumstances change—charge, conviction, regulatory determination or official criticism—check whether a further notification is required.
- Facts and status first.
- Coordinate parallel advice.
- Keep an update log.
Worked example: a police notification
A generic doctor receives notice of a criminal charge. The personal regulatory question is whether Good medical practice requires notification; the criminal question concerns plea, evidence and defence; the employer question concerns risk and work; and the GMC question concerns public protection. The doctor should not wait for one body to notify another or provide an unadvised narrative that prejudges the criminal case.
With advice, the doctor can submit the verified charge, court or police reference, date, next hearing and current safeguards, while avoiding speculation. They should update the GMC when the formal status changes and comply with employer disclosure requirements.
- Use verified legal status.
- Avoid duplicative speculation.
- Maintain an update record.
What may help the GMC assess triage
Relevant material may include the precise allegation, reliable source documents, whether it is isolated or patterned, current patient risk, local investigation and safeguards, the doctor’s engagement, health management, insight and remediation. The regulator may need only limited information at provisional-enquiry stage; sending an uncontrolled bundle can obscure the issue.
A responsible officer’s view carries organisational context but is not the final GMC decision. A doctor can correct factual errors, provide relevant context and identify safe local management through their representative without demanding a particular outcome.
- Relevance over volume.
- Current risk and local safeguards.
- Correct errors with sources.
Which facts establish whether notification is required, and which questions need defence advice before submission?
Keep in mind
Three takeaways
- 1Anyone may raise a concern, but the GMC applies a statutory threshold.
- 2Doctors have personal reporting duties for specified events.
- 3Triage, provisional enquiry and full investigation are different stages.
Situational judgement exercise
Check your understanding
Six questions on GMC referral, self-referral and triage test process and practical judgement. This is educational: it does not assess your health, evidence sufficiency or decide a legal issue.
Question 1 of 6
Choose one answer to continue.
Recommended workbooks
Do not enter patient identifiers or copy material you are not entitled to retain.
Check the source
Page last reviewed 7 September 2026. Independent educational guidance, not an individual legal, employment or regulatory assessment.Official and professional guidance
Open the current source and confirm its jurisdiction before applying it.