T11 Application preparation review — Worked example
2026 digital edition · Dr Naeem Aziz DGM FRCP · 2 min read
Hypothetical worked example
Read with chapter 17
Check completeness against the real process. This review is not a prediction of success and does not replace official forms.
Route
The doctor has assembled material to explore Specialist progression. The preparation review begins by confirming the applicable process; the example does not assume that every UK doctor can use a national regrading route.
Eligibility and scope
Workforce confirmation of the operative conditions is retained with the factual timeline. The current activity is described consistently across T02 and the role documents. Any disputed description is identified rather than silently replaced.
Evidence
The index links claims to selected records and explains their limits. Relevant clinical feedback and broader professional contribution are included. Course certificates support learning history but are not presented as proof of changed practice on their own.
Verification
Check that each statement of observation has a real basis and that no team result is claimed as an individual achievement. Remove unnecessary identifying information from the submission copy using the approved process.
Unresolved matter
If the route or a required form remains uncertain, obtain clarification before presenting the evidence pack as a completed application. Record the responsible contact and response date.
Review conclusion
The review can conclude that the documents are ready for submission under the confirmed process. It cannot declare that a panel must appoint or regrade the doctor. Those decisions belong to the authorised process.