Current developments
GMC training survey shows improvement but persistent variation
General Medical CouncilRCOG refreshes support resources for doctors
Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsRCP publishes SAS priorities for 2026–30
Royal College of PhysiciansRCEM condemns rising violence and discrimination against NHS staff
Royal College of Emergency MedicineRecording facts and protecting confidentiality
Build a reliable chronology without collecting excessive, insecure or patient-identifiable material.
A useful record is contemporaneous, factual, relevant and securely kept. It distinguishes observation from interpretation, links documents without copying unnecessary confidential data and states the effect and action taken.
By the end of this module, you should be able to:
- Create a clear event chronology.
- Distinguish evidence from inference.
- Protect patient, colleague and organisational confidentiality.
Why a chronology helps
Stress disrupts memory and encourages accounts to become organised around emotion rather than sequence. A chronology restores sequence and lets an adviser identify patterns, missing information and deadlines. It can also prevent repeated retelling. The purpose is accuracy, not the construction of an adversarial dossier.
Start with date and time, location or system, people present, what you directly saw or heard, any words recalled accurately, what happened next, immediate effect, action taken and linked document. Mark estimates as estimates. Correct an error transparently rather than silently rewriting an earlier entry.
Fact, report and inference
A fact might be: 'The meeting invitation was sent at 16:42 for 09:00 the next day.' A report is: 'A colleague told me that the meeting had been discussed the previous week.' An inference is: 'I believed the short notice was intended to prevent representation.' All may be relevant, but they should not be presented as the same kind of evidence.
Use exact quotations only when you are confident of the words or have a reliable record. Otherwise say that the wording is approximate and record the substance. Avoid absolute language such as always, never or everyone unless it is literally supported.
Documents and witnesses
List relevant emails, policies, rotas, job plans, minutes, appraisals or messages and preserve them in accordance with policy. Note potential witnesses and what event they may have observed. Do not ask them to endorse your interpretation or circulate a draft statement for group agreement.
A missing document is not an invitation to access systems without authority. Ask the investigating officer or representative how disclosure and preservation will be handled. Keep work records within approved systems where possible and avoid insecure forwarding.
Patient confidentiality
Do not copy names, dates of birth, NHS numbers, clinical screenshots or identifiable narratives into a personal workplace chronology. Use the approved incident or clinical record for patient-specific facts and record only the incident reference in your private index where lawful. A representative can advise how relevant clinical material should be requested through the proper process.
Redaction is more than deleting a name: rare diagnoses, dates, locations and combinations of details can identify a patient or colleague. Share only what is necessary for the specific purpose and use secure channels.
Digital safety and shared devices
The website chronology builder operates in the browser and does not send entries to SAS Doctors Review. If you choose to save information on the device, anyone with access to the same browser profile may be able to see it. Use a trusted private device, remove identifiers and clear the tool after printing or transferring the information securely.
Do not assume cloud notes, personal email or consumer messaging apps are approved for sensitive employment or clinical information. Ask your organisation or representative about secure storage. The absence of a patient name does not automatically make a document harmless.
Prepare for an advice meeting
Send or bring a concise issue summary, chronology, key documents, relevant policy, current deadline, desired outcome and questions. Tell the adviser about related processes and previous advice. This helps limited appointment time focus on decisions rather than reconstruction.
Keep the full record, but identify the three to five events most important to the issue. A short accurate core account with an indexed chronology is usually more usable than an unstructured bundle of hundreds of pages.
Worked example: one chronology entry
A useful entry reads: '3 September, 14:00, departmental meeting. Present: A, B and C. After I asked who would provide senior cover, A said, approximately, that I was being difficult again. B then moved to the next agenda item. I emailed A at 16:10 asking for the cover arrangement. No reply received by 5 September.' It identifies an approximate quotation and subsequent action without asserting motive.
A weaker entry reads: 'Management always bullies me and planned the meeting to humiliate me.' That may express the doctor’s experience, but it does not show the event, source or sequence. Feelings and interpretation can be recorded in separate fields rather than presented as observed fact.
The minimum-necessary test
Before adding or sharing an item, ask whether it is relevant to the issue, whether you are entitled to possess it, whether the recipient needs it, whether identifiers can be removed, whether an approved channel is available and whether a reference would be safer than a copy.
If uncertain, keep the material in its authorised system and ask a representative or investigating officer how it should be obtained. A comprehensive case does not require uncontrolled duplication.
Build a factual chronology
Do not enter patient identifiers, confidential clinical detail or information you are not entitled to retain. Saving is optional and may be unsuitable on a shared device.
Could a neutral reader distinguish what you observed, what you were told and what you concluded?
Three takeaways
- 1Record sequence, source, effect and action.
- 2Label inference and approximate recollection honestly.
- 3Keep identifiable clinical information within authorised systems.
Check your understanding
Six questions on Recording facts and protecting confidentiality test process and practical judgement. This is educational: it does not assess your health, evidence sufficiency or decide a legal issue.
Recommended workbooks
Use these privately and remove identifiable clinical information.
Official and professional guidance
Open the current source and note the jurisdiction before applying it.