Independent news and professional analysis for SAS and locally employed doctors
Browser learning: how to enable itStaff sign-in
SASSAS Doctors ReviewNews · Analysis · Professional perspectiveSearch
Guide news

Current developments

All Latest News →
Careers/Portfolio Pathway/Evidence clinical practice
05
Build the evidence

Clinical scope, breadth, currency and competence

Demonstrate the required range and level of current practice through proportionate, assessed evidence rather than activity volume alone.

18 min readSAS doctorsLocally employed doctorsPortfolio Pathway applicants
Download module PDF ↓Go to knowledge check ↓
The short answer

Clinical evidence must show what the doctor can do, at what level, across the required scope, how recently and with what outcome. Logbooks and activity lists establish exposure, but competence needs assessment and triangulation. Older experience can remain relevant when current evidence shows the capability has been maintained.

Use this now

Three next actions

  1. 1

    Create a scope table covering settings, acuity, age or patient groups, procedures, on-call and emergency work required by the specialty.

  2. 2

    For each area, pair activity data with direct assessment, outcomes or supervisor evidence.

  3. 3

    Flag older or narrow evidence and design current sampling that demonstrates maintenance and breadth.

Learning objectives

By the end of this module, you should be able to:

  • Distinguish exposure, volume, competence and outcome.
  • Apply the GMC approach to evidence currency.
  • Build a representative and proportionate clinical evidence sample.

Define scope before counting volume

Start with the specialty’s required scope: clinical environments, presentations, complexity, emergencies, procedures, longitudinal care, multidisciplinary practice and decisions expected at completion of training. A large logbook from one narrow area may still leave major curriculum gaps.

Describe the applicant’s actual responsibility: independent decision, supervised performance, advice given, escalation and outcome. Avoid inflating autonomy or using local titles as a proxy for level.

  • Map required breadth first.
  • State responsibility accurately.
  • Explain context and supervision.

Four layers of clinical evidence

Activity records show that work occurred. Workplace-based assessments show observed performance. Outcomes, audit or feedback show aspects of effectiveness. Supervisor reports synthesise performance over time. Strong portfolios use these layers together and acknowledge their limitations.

Select methods appropriate to the capability: case-based discussion for reasoning, direct observation for procedure or encounter, multisource feedback for behaviours, longitudinal report for sustained performance, and objective data where valid. No single method is perfect.

  • Triangulate activity, observation and outcome.
  • Match method to claim.
  • Use more than one context or assessor where possible.

Show mature autonomy, including escalation

Autonomy is not working without help. It is making appropriate decisions within scope, recognising uncertainty, seeking assistance at the right time and taking responsibility for follow-through. Evidence can include directly observed decisions, complex case discussions, referral quality, leadership during deterioration and supervisor reports.

Record the limits of authority and local system. An applicant should not perform beyond competence merely to create evidence. Planned supervision is a strength when it enables safe development.

  • Show decisions and thresholds.
  • Include appropriate escalation.
  • Never manufacture independence.

Use the GMC currency policy correctly

The GMC policy states that evidence will normally relate to the most recent five years of practice, but this is not simply five calendar years immediately before application. Older evidence may be considered when current evidence demonstrates that the capability has been maintained. Some specialties may justify more recent evidence for particular skills.

A personal break does not need to be justified through unnecessary private disclosure. The evidential question is whether current knowledge, skills and experience are demonstrated. Use current practice, assessment, CPD and outcome evidence to show maintenance after a gap.

  • Prioritise recent practice.
  • Link older evidence to current maintenance.
  • Protect unnecessary personal information.

Use representative sampling

The aim is not to upload every case. Select evidence that represents the required range, level and contexts, with a clear sampling rationale. Use summaries and indexes to show the wider denominator where appropriate, then provide assessable examples.

Avoid cherry-picking only perfect outcomes. Mature evidence may include complications, uncertainty or improvement when it demonstrates judgement, learning and safer practice. Patient identifiers must be removed and local information-governance rules followed.

  • Explain the sample and denominator.
  • Include learning as well as success.
  • Anonymise before portfolio storage.

Close breadth gaps safely

Where the current post lacks a required area, seek a supervised attachment, revised duties, cross-site sessions, simulation where accepted, formal assessment or a future post. State the exact outcome to be gained and how it will be evidenced.

Do not rely on a past post if the capability is no longer current. The plan may need months of sustained practice rather than a brief observational visit. Ask the specialty adviser what level and duration are likely to be meaningful.

  • Gain practice, not just observation.
  • Use appropriate supervision.
  • Confirm specialty expectations.
Pause and reflect

Which clinical claim in your map currently rests on activity volume without an independent assessment of performance?

Keep in mind

Three takeaways

  1. 1Define required scope before measuring volume.
  2. 2Triangulate activity, observed performance and outcomes.
  3. 3Older evidence needs a current maintenance bridge, not automatic exclusion or automatic acceptance.
Situational judgement exercise

Check your understanding

Six questions on Clinical scope, breadth, currency and competence test process and practical judgement. This is educational: it does not assess your health, evidence sufficiency or decide a legal issue.

Question 1 of 6
A logbook contains 2,000 cases from one clinic but the curriculum requires acute and inpatient practice. What does the logbook show?
Choose one answer to continue.
Apply the learning

Recommended workbooks

Use only authorised, anonymised information. These files remain on your device.

Generic Capabilities Evidence WorkbookDevelop leadership, QI, teaching, research, communication and professional-capability evidence.Download PDF ↓Evidence Map and Verification ControlIndex claims, exact references, triangulation, anonymisation, provenance, translation and final versions.Download PDF ↓
Check the source

Official and professional guidance

Use the current specialty-specific guidance and live GMC instructions at submission.

Page last reviewed 7 September 2026. Independent educational guidance; not a GMC, College or individual application assessment.